soapformulator
English
Butters

Ucuuba Butter

INCI Virola Surinamensis Seed Butter. Also: Virola Surinamensis Seed Butter, Virola Sebifera Nut Oil, Ucuhuba Butter.

Calculate a 100 % Ucuuba Butter bar

Published values

Saponification value181.1–220 mg KOH/g
Used by the calculator200.6 mg KOH/g (midpoint)
SAP for NaOH0.1430 g/g
Iodine value
INS (SAP − IV)
Melting point42–53 °C
Unsaponifiable matter

A bar made of 100 % Ucuuba Butter

Hardness 100 above 29–54
Cleansing 92 above 12–22
Conditioning 0 below 44–69
Bubbly lather 92 above 14–46
Creamy lather 8 below 16–48

Conventional qualities summed from the fatty-acid groups; a single-oil bar is a reference point, not a recipe.

These two published numbers disagree. The saponification value on record is 200.6 mg KOH/g, but the fatty-acid profile below implies about 235 — a gap of 15 %. The two are not independent facts: chain length fixes the molar mass, which fixes how much lye a gram of fat consumes. So one of the two fields is wrong, or they were measured on samples that are not comparable, and the disagreement is upstream in the literature rather than in the arithmetic here.

The calculator uses the published value, because that is what the source says. If you are building a recipe with a lot of this ingredient, weigh the risk: at 15 % it would shift your lye by roughly that much for the portion of the batch it makes up. A certificate of analysis for your own lot settles it. The notes below record which documents were checked.

Fatty-acid profile

Fatty acidPublished range, %Used
Lauric acid C12:0 · saturated 16–20 18.0
Myristic acid C14:0 · saturated 72–76 74.0
Palmitic acid C16:0 · saturated 7–9 8.0

Where these numbers come from

Revista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas Basica e Aplicada (UFOPA)Feitosa JM, Silva TSA, Xavier AEF, Rodrigues WCS, Silva ACE, Correa CVP, Aguiar FS, Mourao RHV, Oliveira EG, Nunes KM. "Evaluation of the quality of Amazonian butters as sustainable raw materials for applications in bioproducts." Rev Cienc Farm Basica Apl. 2021;42:e708. DOI 10.4322/2179-443X.0708. · document dated 2021 · read 2026-09-21

Table 2 (SAP, directly titrated; iodine marked NA), Table 3 (GC-MS fatty acids for their specific lot), melting point in Results text, and discussion text (p.5-6) quoting the raw-material supplier's own spec range and flagging possible adulteration. Species tested: Virola sebifera. Open-access PDF read in full.

Amazon Oil (producer)Ucuuba Butter (Virola surinamensis) technical/product page · read 2026-09-21

Producer page states SAP 220 mg KOH/g, melting point 53C, and seed fat approx. 70% trimyristin. No iodine value or full fatty-acid percentage table given.

Pharmaceutics (MDPI)Pereira RR, Testi M, Rossi F, Silva Junior JOC, Ribeiro-Costa RM, Bettini R, Santi P, Padula C, Sonvico F. "Ucuuba (Virola surinamensis) Fat-Based Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Nail Drug Delivery of Ketoconazole: Development and Optimization Using Box-Behnken Design." Pharmaceutics 11(6):284. · document dated 2019-06-17 · read 2026-09-21

Table 6 / Section 2.2: DSC-measured melting point of the ucuuba fat used, ~42-43C. This paper's own text states the fatty-acid composition it describes (myristic/lauric-dominant) is cited from an external source (Serra et al., not independently opened by me), not independently measured in this paper.

Two different Virola species/producers cover this id (both fit the brief's 'Virola surinamensis/sebifera'): Feitosa et al. 2021 (open access, read in full as a PDF) tested a Virola sebifera commercial lot from Belem, Brazil; Amazon Oil's producer page and Pereira et al. 2019 (Pharmaceutics, PMC6630981) both label their material Virola surinamensis. SAP range combines Feitosa's directly-titrated 181.10 +/- 2.38 mg KOH/g (Table 2, flagged by that paper as 'in accordance with their own specification') with Amazon Oil's stated producer spec of 220 mg KOH/g - no typical value is given because the two disagree and I cannot say which is more representative. Iodine value: left NULL. Feitosa et al. 2021 marked iodine 'NA' for ucuuba because no unsaturated fatty acids were detected by GC-MS in their sample (i.e. it tested as essentially 100% saturated); that same paper mentions in its discussion that 'its supplier report provided an iodine index of 14 g I2/100g for this butter, despite its fatty acid composition being 100% saturated' - the paper's own authors call this inconsistent, so I did not transcribe the 14 figure. Amazon Oil's producer page and Pereira et al. 2019 do not give an iodine value either. Fatty-acid composition uses the supplier-report range Feitosa et al. 2021 quotes in its discussion (p.5) - myristic 72-76%, lauric 16-20%, palmitic 7-9% - because it is corroborated by Amazon Oil's producer page (states ucuuba seeds are approx. 70% trimyristin, the triglyceride of myristic acid) and matches the broad direction of general secondary literature (myristic-dominant, not independently opened by me in full). Feitosa et al. 2021's OWN directly-measured GC-MS result for their specific lot was inverted: lauric 73.30%, myristic 11.18%, caprylic 11.63%, capric 3.80% - their discussion explicitly says this 'does not corroborate with the specifications provided in the supplier report' and separately flags their measured melting point (49C, see below) as possibly indicating 'contamination/adulteration' in that lot. Given that self-flagged doubt, the inverted GC-MS profile was NOT used as the primary fatty-acid figures here, but is recorded for transparency - a human merging this record should weigh both. Melting point range spans three directly-opened sources: Feitosa et al. 2021 measured 49 +/- 0.58C (their discussion notes this differs from Pardauil et al.'s reported 37C, itself not independently opened by me); Amazon Oil's producer page states 53C; Pereira et al. 2019 (Pharmaceutics) used/measured Tm approx. 42C by DSC (peak 42.99C, their Table 6) for their Virola surinamensis material. Unsaponifiable matter: not reported in any of the three opened sources - left null.

This record is part of the open ingredient database (ODbL). Found an error or a better primary source? The dataset is on GitHub; corrections with a document link are welcome.