soapformulator
ES
Mantecas

Manteca de mowrah

También: Manteca de mahua.

Calcular una pastilla 100 % de manteca de mowrah

Valores publicados

Índice de saponificación187–196 mg KOH/g
Usado por la calculadora191,5 mg KOH/g (punto medio)
SAP para NaOH0,1365 g/g
Índice de yodo58–70 g I₂/100 g (típico 61,1)
INS (SAP − índice de yodo)130
Punto de fusión35,5 °C
Materia insaponificable≤ 2 %

Una pastilla hecha 100 % de manteca de mowrah

Dureza 43 29–54
Poder limpiador 0 por debajo de 12–22
Acondicionamiento 53 44–69
Espuma burbujeante 0 por debajo de 14–46
Espuma cremosa 43 16–48

Cualidades convencionales sumadas a partir de los grupos de ácidos grasos; una pastilla de un solo aceite es una referencia, no una receta.

Perfil de ácidos grasos

Ácido grasoRango publicado, %Usado
Ácido mirístico C14:0 · saturados ≤ 0,2 0,2
Ácido palmítico C16:0 · saturados 20–28,2 (típico 20,88) 20,9
Ácido esteárico C18:0 · saturados 14–38 (típico 22,05) 22,1
Ácido oleico C18:1 37–50 (típico 44,02) 44,0
Ácido linoleico C18:2 2–15,8 (típico 7,85) 7,9
Ácido α-linolénico C18:3 n-3 ≤ 1 1,0
Ácido araquídico C20:0 · saturados ≤ 3 3,0

De dónde salen estos números

Las notas con fuente que aparecen debajo, y los títulos de los documentos que citan, se mantienen en su idioma original. Una cita traducida no se puede consultar, y un resumen técnico traducido ya no es el resumen que se contrastó con el documento.

Japan Oil Chemists' Society (Journal of Oleo Science), open access via J-STAGE — Marikkar JMN, Ghazali HM, Long K. 'Composition and thermal characteristics of Madhuca longifolia seed fat and its solid and liquid fractions.' J. Oleo Sci. 59(1):7-14 (2010). DOI 10.5650/jos.59.7. · documento fechado el 2010 · consultado el 2026-09-24

Table 1 (iodine value, slip melting point) and Table 2 (fatty acids) for the native fat (MF).

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India — Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011 - Chapter 2.2 'Fats, Oils and Fat Emulsions', Version 5 (01.08.2025), 2.2.1 item 5 'Mahua oil' · documento fechado el 2025-08-01 · consultado el 2026-09-24

Mahua oil (refined): refractive index 1.4590-1.4611 at 40 C, saponification value 187-196, iodine value 58-70, unsaponifiable matter not more than 2.0 %, acid value not more than 0.50.

PlantFAdb (Michigan State University), based on the Seed Oil Fatty Acids (SOFA) database of the Max Rubner-Institut — PlantFAdb datasets for Madhuca longifolia (plant 10005) · consultado el 2026-09-24

Datasets #22003 (1984), #20785 (1969), #22594 (1968), #10003 (1971) and #12918 (unsaponifiables, 1974).

PlantFAdb (Michigan State University), based on the Seed Oil Fatty Acids (SOFA) database of the Max Rubner-Institut — PlantFAdb datasets for Madhuca latifolia (plant 10004) · consultado el 2026-09-24

Datasets #15197 (1976), #22002 (1984), #20781 (1969), #22593 (1968), #22441 (1968) and #10002 (1971).

PlantFAdb (Michigan State University), based on the Seed Oil Fatty Acids (SOFA) database of the Max Rubner-Institut — PlantFAdb datasets for Madhuca indica (plant 14428) · consultado el 2026-09-24

Dataset #23577 (2010) used; #12466 (1991) not used (see notes).

The seed fat of Madhuca longifolia (mee, illupai) and M. longifolia var. latifolia (syn. M. latifolia, M. indica, Bassia latifolia; mahua of north India); both are traded as mowrah or mahua butter. Typical values are Marikkar, Ghazali & Long 2010 (J. Oleo Sci. 59(1):7-14), mee fat from three locations in the North Central Province of Sri Lanka: Table 2 C16:0 20.88 +/- 1.51, C18:0 22.05 +/- 0.9, C18:1 44.02 +/- 1.1, C18:2 7.85 +/- 0.77 (saturated 43.4, unsaturated 51.85; only these four acids are reported, 94.8 % in total); Table 1 iodine value 61.1 +/- 0.35 g I2/100 g and slip melting point 35.5 +/- 0.5 C. (The paper's acetone fractions are different materials: solid fraction 25.28/29.01/38.38/5.72, iodine 47.05, slip melting point 46.5 C; liquid fraction 19.28/16.2/53.12/9.61, iodine 64.4, cloud point 10.5 C.) Saponification value 187-196, iodine value 58-70 and unsaponifiable matter not more than 2.0 % are the FSSAI standard for 'Mahua oil' (Chapter 2.2, 2.2.1 item 5: 'the oil expressed from clean and sound seeds or nuts of Madhuca (Bassi latifolia or B. longifolia or a mixture of both)', which 'shall be refined'), which also sets refractive index 1.4590-1.4611 at 40 C and acid value not more than 0.50. Ranges add PlantFAdb's datasets (order in each: palmitic, linoleic, oleic, stearic). M. longifolia: 'Butter from plants' (1984) 28.2, 8.9, 48.8, 14.1; 'Fette und Lipoide' (1969) 28.0, 8.0, 50.0, 14.0; 'New tropical seed oils 2' (1968) 22.0, 2.0, 37.0, 38.0, C20:0 1.0; Tropical Products Institute (1971) 28.0, 9.0, 49.0, 14.0. M. latifolia: 'Analysis of edible fats' (1976) 20.0, 11.0, 44.0, 22.0, C20:0 3.0; 'Butter from plants' (1984) and 'Studies in interesterification II' (1968), identical: C14:0 0.2, 23.5, 15.4, 39.3, 21.6; 'Fette und Lipoide' (1969) 23.7, 15.8, 38.5, 22.0, C18:3 0.0; 'New tropical seed oils 2' (1968) 21.0, 15.0, 38.0, 25.0, C18:3 1.0; Tropical Products Institute (1971) 23.7, 13.7, 43.3, 19.3. M. indica (a 2010 non-edible-oil paper): 24.5, 14.3, 37.0, 22.7. Not used: a 1991 M. indica dataset reporting 17.9 % '18:3' and no 18:2 (probably linoleic acid mislabelled) and a 1977 Bassia latifolia dataset whose values sum to 104.3 %. The typical unsaponifiable matter (1.11 %) is PlantFAdb's M. longifolia entry from a 1974 sterol study. The stearic range (14-38 %) reflects real differences between the analyses; the 38 % is one 1968 M. longifolia sample. Check: the typical profile (four acids) implies about 194 mg KOH/g, inside the FSSAI range. INCI left for review: CosIng has both 'Madhuca Longifolia Seed Oil' (fixed oil expressed from the seeds of Madhuca longifolia, Sapotaceae) and 'Bassia Latifolia Seed Butter' (whose CosIng description puts Bassia latifolia in Chenopodiaceae), and which one applies depends on the material sold.

Esta ficha forma parte de la base de datos abierta de ingredientes (ODbL). ¿Ha encontrado un error o una fuente primaria mejor? El conjunto de datos está en GitHub; las correcciones con un enlace al documento son bienvenidas.