soapformulator
Deutsch
Buttersorten

Mangobutter

INCI-Bezeichnung: Mangifera Indica Seed Butter. Mit NaOH verseift steht es als Sodium Mangoseedate in der Liste, mit KOH als Potassium Mangoseedate. Auch: Mangokernbutter.

Seife aus 100 % Mangobutter berechnen

Veröffentlichte Werte

Verseifungszahl167.53–188.44 mg KOH/g
Vom Rechner verwendet178.0 mg KOH/g (Mittelwert)
VZ für NaOH0.1269 g/g
Jodzahl44.84–59.41 g I₂/100 g
INS (VZ − JZ)126
Schmelzpunkt17.64–34.32 °C
Unverseifbare Anteile0.94–1.9 %

Eine Seife aus 100 % Mangobutter

Härte 45 29–54
Reinigend 11 unter 12–22
Pflegend 54 44–69
Schäumend 11 unter 14–46
Cremig 34 16–48

Übliche Eigenschaften, summiert aus den Fettsäuregruppen; eine Seife aus einem einzigen Öl ist ein Bezugspunkt, kein Rezept.

Dieser Datensatz ist strittig. This profile is one laboratory's measurement of four Ivorian cultivars, and independent sources contradict it on three acids. It records lauric 4-10 % and myristic 2-7 %, where Muchiri et al. 2012 found myristic at trace to 0.05 % across four Kenyan varieties and did not detect lauric at all, and it records alpha-linolenic 5-14 % against 0.6-1.8 % in that same study and 2.3 % in Nzikou et al. 2010. Van Pee et al.'s thirteen-variety survey found linolenic to be the smallest minor acid in every variety, which is the reverse of what this record shows. For a soapmaker this matters because those acids drive the cleansing number: as recorded, mango butter scores about 11 for cleansing, and the mainstream composition would put it near zero. Treat the qualities for this ingredient as unsettled, and prefer a certificate of analysis for your own lot. The corroborating papers were paywalled, so they have not been transcribed into this record in place of the source that was opened.

Fettsäureprofil

FettsäureVeröffentlichte Spanne, %Verwendet
Laurinsäure C12:0 · gesättigt 4.03–9.83 6.9
Myristinsäure C14:0 · gesättigt 1.85–7.11 4.5
Palmitinsäure C16:0 · gesättigt 0.54–6.81 3.7
Stearinsäure C18:0 · gesättigt 20.11–40.43 30.3
Ölsäure C18:1 31.14–37.19 34.2
Linolsäure C18:2 3.7–16.91 10.3
α-Linolensäure C18:3 n-3 5.34–14.27 9.8
Arachinsäure C20:0 · gesättigt 2.26–11.69 7.0

Woher diese Zahlen kommen

Die mit Quellen belegten Anmerkungen unten und die Titel der zitierten Dokumente bleiben in ihrer Originalsprache. Eine übersetzte Quellenangabe lässt sich nicht nachschlagen, und eine übersetzte fachliche Zusammenfassung ist nicht mehr die Zusammenfassung, die anhand des Dokuments geprüft wurde.

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews (GSC Online Press), open accessDiomande M, Konan KH, Koffi TDM, Gbotognon JO, Kanga KA, Kouadio EJP, Kouame LP. "Physicochemical characteristics and fatty acid composition of kernels oil from four mangoes varieties (Mangifera indica) (Kent, Brooks, Keitt and Amelie) harvested, processed in North of Cote d'Ivoire." World J Adv Res Rev. 2021;11(3):102-108. doi:10.30574/wjarr.2021.11.3.0334 · Dokument vom 2021 · abgerufen am 2026-09-21

Table 1 (physical properties incl. melting point), Table 2 (chemical properties: SAP, iodine, unsaponifiable matter), Table 3 (complete fatty-acid composition), all broken down by the four mango varieties studied.

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of IndiaFood Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011 - Chapter 2.2 'Fats, Oils and Fat Emulsions', Version 5 (01.08.2025), item 8 'Mango Kernel Fat' · Dokument vom 2025-08-01 · abgerufen am 2026-09-21

Regulatory identity standard for the refined commercial product: saponification value 185-198, iodine value (Wijs) 32-57, unsaponifiable matter not more than 1.5%, butyro-refractometer reading at 40 C 43.7-51.6 (or refractive index 1.4550-1.4604). Used as corroboration only; the structured fields use Diomande et al.'s measured values.

All structured fields are from a single complete primary source, Diomande et al. 2021 (World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, open access), which measured four Ivorian mango varieties (Amelie, Brooks, Kent, Keitt) individually - the min/max spans the four varieties' own measured values, not a literature compilation. Table 1: melting point 17.64-34.32 C (a wide spread - two of the four varieties melt well below what is usually called a 'butter', reflecting real cultivar variation in this kernel fat). Table 2: saponification number 167.53-188.44 mg KOH/g; iodine value (Wijs) 44.84-59.41 gI2/100g; unsaponifiable matter 0.94-1.90% of total lipid. Table 3: complete fatty-acid profile (8 acids; each variety's own values sum to approximately 100%): lauric 4.03-9.83%, myristic 1.85-7.11%, palmitic 0.54-6.81%, stearic 20.11-40.43%, arachidic 2.26-11.69%, linolenic 5.34-14.27%, linoleic 3.70-16.91%, oleic 31.14-37.19%. Cross-checked against the FSSAI (India) 'Mango Kernel Fat' regulatory standard (Chapter 2.2, item 8): saponification value 185-198, iodine value (Wijs) 32-57, unsaponifiable matter not more than 1.5% - overlaps this paper's measured ranges reasonably well (the FSSAI standard governs the refined commercial product; Diomande et al. analyzed raw kernel oil from named cultivars, hence the slightly wider/lower spread). No melting point or fatty-acid table is given by the FSSAI standard (it uses a butyro-refractometer/refractive-index identity test instead), so those two fields rely on Diomande et al. alone. DISPUTED, PENDING CORROBORATION (flagged 2026-09-21): this is a single-source profile from four Ivorian cultivars, and it disagrees with the mainstream description of mango kernel fat on three fields. It reports lauric 4.03-9.83 % and myristic 1.85-7.11 %, where mango kernel fat is usually described as carrying little or none of either, and alpha-linolenic 5.34-14.27 % against a more usual figure below 2 %. Those values give the fat a cleansing number of about 11 in the soap-quality convention, which is not how mango butter behaves. Treat the profile as one laboratory's measurement of four specific cultivars rather than as a general figure for the ingredient, until a second primary source corroborates it.

Dieser Datensatz ist Teil der offenen Zutatendatenbank (ODbL). Einen Fehler oder eine bessere Primärquelle gefunden? Der Datenbestand liegt auf GitHub; Korrekturen mit Link auf das Dokument sind willkommen.