soapformulator
Français
Beurres

Beurre de mangue

Nom INCI : Mangifera Indica Seed Butter. Après saponification au NaOH, le nom déclaré est Sodium Mangoseedate ; au KOH, Potassium Mangoseedate. Aussi : Beurre de noyau de mangue.

Calculer un savon 100 % beurre de mangue

Valeurs publiées

Indice de saponification167.53–188.44 mg KOH/g
Utilisé par le calculateur178.0 mg KOH/g (milieu de plage)
Indice pour le NaOH0.1269 g/g
Indice d’iode44.84–59.41 g I₂/100 g
INS (SAP − indice d’iode)126
Point de fusion17.64–34.32 °C
Matière insaponifiable0.94–1.9 %

Un savon fait à 100 % de beurre de mangue

Dureté 45 29–54
Pouvoir lavant 11 en dessous de 12–22
Douceur 54 44–69
Mousse bulleuse 11 en dessous de 14–46
Mousse crémeuse 34 16–48

Qualités conventionnelles additionnées à partir des groupes d’acides gras ; un savon à une seule huile est un repère, pas une recette.

Cette fiche est contestée. This profile is one laboratory's measurement of four Ivorian cultivars, and independent sources contradict it on three acids. It records lauric 4-10 % and myristic 2-7 %, where Muchiri et al. 2012 found myristic at trace to 0.05 % across four Kenyan varieties and did not detect lauric at all, and it records alpha-linolenic 5-14 % against 0.6-1.8 % in that same study and 2.3 % in Nzikou et al. 2010. Van Pee et al.'s thirteen-variety survey found linolenic to be the smallest minor acid in every variety, which is the reverse of what this record shows. For a soapmaker this matters because those acids drive the cleansing number: as recorded, mango butter scores about 11 for cleansing, and the mainstream composition would put it near zero. Treat the qualities for this ingredient as unsettled, and prefer a certificate of analysis for your own lot. The corroborating papers were paywalled, so they have not been transcribed into this record in place of the source that was opened.

Profil d’acides gras

Acide grasPlage publiée, %Utilisé
Acide laurique C12:0 · saturés 4.03–9.83 6.9
Acide myristique C14:0 · saturés 1.85–7.11 4.5
Acide palmitique C16:0 · saturés 0.54–6.81 3.7
Acide stéarique C18:0 · saturés 20.11–40.43 30.3
Acide oléique C18:1 31.14–37.19 34.2
Acide linoléique C18:2 3.7–16.91 10.3
Acide α-linolénique C18:3 n-3 5.34–14.27 9.8
Acide arachidique C20:0 · saturés 2.26–11.69 7.0

D’où viennent ces nombres

Les notes sourcées ci-dessous, ainsi que les titres des documents qu’elles citent, sont conservées dans leur langue d’origine. Une référence traduite ne peut plus être retrouvée, et un résumé technique traduit n’est plus le résumé qui a été vérifié par rapport au document.

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews (GSC Online Press), open accessDiomande M, Konan KH, Koffi TDM, Gbotognon JO, Kanga KA, Kouadio EJP, Kouame LP. "Physicochemical characteristics and fatty acid composition of kernels oil from four mangoes varieties (Mangifera indica) (Kent, Brooks, Keitt and Amelie) harvested, processed in North of Cote d'Ivoire." World J Adv Res Rev. 2021;11(3):102-108. doi:10.30574/wjarr.2021.11.3.0334 · document daté du 2021 · consulté le 2026-09-21

Table 1 (physical properties incl. melting point), Table 2 (chemical properties: SAP, iodine, unsaponifiable matter), Table 3 (complete fatty-acid composition), all broken down by the four mango varieties studied.

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of IndiaFood Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011 - Chapter 2.2 'Fats, Oils and Fat Emulsions', Version 5 (01.08.2025), item 8 'Mango Kernel Fat' · document daté du 2025-08-01 · consulté le 2026-09-21

Regulatory identity standard for the refined commercial product: saponification value 185-198, iodine value (Wijs) 32-57, unsaponifiable matter not more than 1.5%, butyro-refractometer reading at 40 C 43.7-51.6 (or refractive index 1.4550-1.4604). Used as corroboration only; the structured fields use Diomande et al.'s measured values.

All structured fields are from a single complete primary source, Diomande et al. 2021 (World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, open access), which measured four Ivorian mango varieties (Amelie, Brooks, Kent, Keitt) individually - the min/max spans the four varieties' own measured values, not a literature compilation. Table 1: melting point 17.64-34.32 C (a wide spread - two of the four varieties melt well below what is usually called a 'butter', reflecting real cultivar variation in this kernel fat). Table 2: saponification number 167.53-188.44 mg KOH/g; iodine value (Wijs) 44.84-59.41 gI2/100g; unsaponifiable matter 0.94-1.90% of total lipid. Table 3: complete fatty-acid profile (8 acids; each variety's own values sum to approximately 100%): lauric 4.03-9.83%, myristic 1.85-7.11%, palmitic 0.54-6.81%, stearic 20.11-40.43%, arachidic 2.26-11.69%, linolenic 5.34-14.27%, linoleic 3.70-16.91%, oleic 31.14-37.19%. Cross-checked against the FSSAI (India) 'Mango Kernel Fat' regulatory standard (Chapter 2.2, item 8): saponification value 185-198, iodine value (Wijs) 32-57, unsaponifiable matter not more than 1.5% - overlaps this paper's measured ranges reasonably well (the FSSAI standard governs the refined commercial product; Diomande et al. analyzed raw kernel oil from named cultivars, hence the slightly wider/lower spread). No melting point or fatty-acid table is given by the FSSAI standard (it uses a butyro-refractometer/refractive-index identity test instead), so those two fields rely on Diomande et al. alone. DISPUTED, PENDING CORROBORATION (flagged 2026-09-21): this is a single-source profile from four Ivorian cultivars, and it disagrees with the mainstream description of mango kernel fat on three fields. It reports lauric 4.03-9.83 % and myristic 1.85-7.11 %, where mango kernel fat is usually described as carrying little or none of either, and alpha-linolenic 5.34-14.27 % against a more usual figure below 2 %. Those values give the fat a cleansing number of about 11 in the soap-quality convention, which is not how mango butter behaves. Treat the profile as one laboratory's measurement of four specific cultivars rather than as a general figure for the ingredient, until a second primary source corroborates it.

Cette fiche fait partie de la base d’ingrédients ouverte (ODbL). Vous avez trouvé une erreur ou une meilleure source primaire ? Le jeu de données est sur GitHub ; les corrections accompagnées d’un lien vers un document sont bienvenues.